<!-- © 2003-2008 Old Bailey Proceedings Online -->
<TEI.2>
<text>
<body>
<div0 id="17440728" type="sessionsPaper" fragment="yes">
<div1 type="trialAccount" id="t17440728-45">
<xptr type="pageFacsimile" doc="174407280040"/>
<xptr type="preceedingDiv" divtype="trialAccount" id="t17440728-44"/>
<xptr type="followingDiv" divtype="supplementaryMaterial" id="o17440728-1"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45" type="collection" value="BAILEY"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45" type="year" value="1744"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45" type="uri" value="sessionsPapers/17440728"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45" type="date" value="17440728"/>
<join result="criminalCharge" id="t17440728-45-off253-c519" targOrder="Y" targets="t17440728-45-defend615 t17440728-45-off253 t17440728-45-verdict254"/>
<p>351.
<persName id="t17440728-45-defend615" type="defendantName"> Elizabeth Nicholls
<interp inst="t17440728-45-defend615" type="surname" value="Nicholls"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45-defend615" type="given" value="Elizabeth"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45-defend615" type="gender" value="female"/> </persName> was indicted for
<rs id="t17440728-45-off253" type="offenceDescription">
<interp inst="t17440728-45-off253" type="offenceCategory" value="deception"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45-off253" type="offenceSubcategory" value="perjury"/> subornation of perjury </rs>, but the principal witness against her being described in the indictment by the name of
<persName id="t17440728-45-person616"> Mary Tannatt
<interp inst="t17440728-45-person616" type="surname" value="Tannatt"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45-person616" type="given" value="Mary"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45-person616" type="gender" value="female"/> </persName> , wife of
<persName id="t17440728-45-person617"> Thomas Tannatt
<interp inst="t17440728-45-person617" type="surname" value="Tannatt"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45-person617" type="given" value="Thomas"/>
<interp inst="t17440728-45-person617" type="gender" value="male"/> </persName> , and it appearing by her own evidence that she had information of the death of her husband , she could not be examined against the Prisoner, and she was thereupon
<rs id="t17440728-45-verdict254" type="verdictDescription">
<interp inst="t17440728-45-verdict254" type="verdictCategory" value="notGuilty"/> acquitted </rs>.</p> </div1></div0>
</body>
</text>
</TEI.2>

View as Text